Effects of biphasic vs monophasic defibrillation on the scaling exponent in a swine model of prolonged ventricular fibrillation.

OBJECTIVE: Mathematical analyses of ventricular fibrillation (VF) have resulted in the derivation of a measure termed the scaling exponent (ScE) that characterizes the duration of VF and probability of defibrillation success. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of biphasic defibrillation waveform (BDW) and monophasic defibrillation waveform (MDW) rescue shocks on ScE in a swine model of prolonged VF. METHODS: Utstein guidelines for the laboratory study of cardiopulmonary resuscitation were followed. Twenty mixed-breed domestic swine (mass range 20.5-26.8 kg) were instrumented and randomized to receive either MDW or BDW rescue shocks. Ventricular fibrillation was induced and untreated for a nonintervention interval of 8 minutes. Rescue shocks were delivered at 8, 10, and 12 minutes of elapsed VF time. The energy sequence for the three MDW shocks was 70, 100, and 150 J (approximately 3, 4, and 6 J/kg). All BDW shocks were delivered at 50 J (approximately 2.5 J/kg). Only VF was shocked. Chest compressions and drugs were not provided. Rhythm analysis and ScE calculation were performed offline. Continuous and discontinuous linear regression models were fit to plots of ScE vs time. Defibrillation success and progression of ScE slope were analyzed using Fisher's exact test, paired t-tests, and repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar for both groups. Successful termination of VF occurred on the first rescue shock in 1 of 10 (10%) in the MDW group and 3 of 10 (30%) in the BDW group; this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.58). No other defibrillation successes were observed. No animals achieved return of spontaneous circulation. The ScE values during the protocol progressed from 1.330 (95% CI = 1.287 to 1.373) to 1.724 (95% CI = 1.603 to 1.845) for MDW and 1.338 (95% CI = 1.261 to 1.415) to 1.639 (95% CI = 1.530 to 1.745) for BDW. Both groups showed a trend toward increasing ScE values with successive rescue shocks. Repeated-measures ANOVA using both continuous and discontinuous models demonstrated no difference in overall ScE slope progression between study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Mode of defibrillation waveform (BDW vs MDW) does not appear to impact ScE trends. Additional studies must be performed to better evaluate the clinical implications of this finding.

Physician interpretation and quantitative measures of electrocardiographic ventricular fibrillation waveform.

OBJECTIVES: The characteristics of the ventricular fibrillation (VF) waveform may influence treatment decisions and the likelihood of therapeutic success. However, assessment of VF as being fine or coarse and the distinction between fine VF and asystole are largely subjective. The authors sought to determine the level of agreement among physicians for interpretation of varying VF waveforms, and to compare these subjective interpretations with quantitative measures. METHODS: Six-second segments of waveform from LIFEPAK 300 units were collected. Fifty segments, including 45 VF and five ventricular tachycardia (VT) distracters, were graphed to simulate rhythm strips. These waveforms were quantitatively described using scaling exponent, root-mean-squared amplitude, and centroid frequency. Thirty-two emergency medicine residents were asked to interpret the arrhythmias as VT, "coarse" VF, "fine" VF, or asystole. Their responses were compared with the qantitative measures. Interphysician agreement was assessed with the kappa statistic. RESULTS: One thousand four hundred forty interpretations were analyzed. There was fair agreement between physicians about the classification of arrhythmias (kappa = 0.39). Mean values associated with coarse VF, fine VF, and asystole differed in all three quantitative measure categories. The decision whether to defibrillate was highly correlated with the distinction between VF and asystole (Pearson chi-square = 1,170.40, df = 1, p[two-sided] < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: With only fair agreement on the threshold of fine VF and asystole, defibrillation decisions are largely subjective and caregiver-specific. These data suggest that quantitative measures of the VF waveform could augment the current standard of subjective classification of VF by emergency care providers.